European news, American news, biased outlets on the Internet, no collaboration at all
Type Ashton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI7b9UcgQjw
Comment:
I cannot tell if you are having any positive effect. To analyze that takes considerable effort, even for someone who does it very day. Generating entertainment does not cost much and might earn someone a living or following. There is a lot of that now on the Internet. But real change, not so much. Or not at all.
It seems you could only indicate some level of awareness of the issues. But, no one using news has any say on how it is done. It is just a sometime raucous spectator sport. Complaint only just drives more news media streams about the news and does nothing at all to change power, ownership and manipulation or value. Perhaps if most of the news stopped, no one would notice.
It is just a tool for a few to make money and try to influence others.
So how long did you “watch European News” A few hours? A few hundred hours? 10,000 hours of intense analysis and deep simulations? And now you understand the dynamics of all Europeans, their cultures their institutions, habits, wants and needs?
I get on the LLM type AIs all the time because they just churn out “plausible entertaining and provocative sentences”. And they give zero references or real lossless and verifiable data. But are you doing anything different? One person can have an effect, but I think you would have to work about 1000 times harder.
If you do not like my comment tell me and I will edit it to say “Innocuous $Thanks Keep up the good work!”
Filed as “European news, American news, biased outlets on the Internet, no collaboration at all”
@TypeAshton Thank you for explaining. I am just trying to understand the true difficulty of various questions. With these large language models and various computers now processing billions of documents, are they even enough to answer questions about fairness for tens or hundreds of millions of humans? The idea is that they can get smarter “if there was just more or enough data”. We give absolute powers to a handful of human leaders, knowing they are making decisions based on little or no information relative to the size and complexity of the problem. What if they are tired or sick or too busy? I was just trying to understand if there was a way to measure or estimate what is required to get enough information to make fair decisions at country or global scale. How do we know if the news people have put in enough effort, mostly they do not keep open records, nor do the people reporting problems give their detailed evidence clearly so many people, even billions, could combine their knowledge and experience to solve truly global issues affecting countries or the whole world?
Sorry, today I am really tired, the world seems to offer little hope and still more complexity every day. I am so tired of wars, chaotic and fragmented news. I wonder if there is a way to combine the intelligence of all people – to arrive at understandable, clear and fair decisions. It seems that hundreds of millions or billions of people ought to be smarter than one. If that information could be combined in a fair and open way.
