Category: Gravitational Engineering

Updating a link on Hackaday.io for Low Cost, Time of flight, gravitational imaging arrays

​https://hackaday.io/project/164550-low-cost-time-of-flight-gravimeter-arrays/log/208711-more-information-posted-at-researchgate-on-3-axis-gravimeters/discussion-195371 https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Collins-16 ResearchGate canceled their project support last year and I managed to save some things before they erased everything. I had/have a few dozen followers and collaborators.  I have been working on many things and still many different designs and things related to gravitational imaging.  But I am not making devices, only checking components. Do you
Read More »

Some Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation footprint sites

Some of my Internet footprints: https://twitter.com/RichardKCollin2 – Internet Foundation, Gravitational Engineering   https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard-Collins-16 – Solar System Gravimetry   TheInternetFoundation.Net,.Org,.Com – Internet Foundation Gravitation, Comments   https://hackaday.io/Foundation – Gravitational detectors, Gravitational engineering   https://GravityNotes.Org – Older notes on using gravitational sensor arrays to monitor global geophysical processes. https://www.youtube.com/@richardcollins5549  There are many videos on YouTube but I
Read More »

Every day gravity is Newtonian, and gets more interesting at higher sampling rates

https://twitter.com/RichardKCollin2/status/1741046739237228715 Sensitive three axis gravimeters show that vector sun moon tidal signals are nearly perfectly Newtonian, only requiring three linear regressions (6 numbers) to lock a station to the sun and moon for position and orientation sensing. Many types now.   https://twitter.com/RichardKCollin2/status/1693165581329985565   This is one month for the vertical component of the vectors signal.
Read More »

Gravitational fields and living cells, the brain?

CLaE @leafs_s  nature Mysterious ultraslow and ordered activity observed in the cortex https://nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03795-9 Replying to @leafs_s You might look at what Ilya Prigogine and Dilip Kondepudi wrote in 1983 after Prigogine got his Nobel prize. “Sensitivity of Nonequilibrium Chemical Systems to Gravitational Field” DK Kondepudi, I Prigogine. It is listed in Google Scholar and there
Read More »

Gravity is often ignored or considered constant or negligible. Gravity has a wide measurable spectrum, from at least nanoHertz to gamma ray frequencies.

John Preskill @preskill “The goal of airing some skepticism, [Matthias] Troyer says, is not to diminish interest in the field, but to ensure that researchers are focused on the most promising applications of quantum computing with the greatest chance of impact.” https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-computing-skeptics Replying to @preskill John, besides, offering skepticism, or simply pointing out directions with
Read More »

Gravity can be linear, but also nonlinear with flows and fluctuations

Science News @ScienceNews Jonathan Oppenheim thinks that gravity might be fundamentally classical, meaning it isn’t quantum at all. https://sciencenews.org/article/gravity-quantum-mechanics-physics-theory Replying to @ScienceNews Yes. 20 years ago I used the small network of superconducting gravimeters to measure the speed of gravity. At low sampling rates, the field is nearly perfectly Newtonian. At micro nano pico femto
Read More »

Richard talks to OpenAI ChatGPT Plus about KeV and MeV magnetic bonds between neutrons protons and electrons

Richard talks to OpenAI ChatGPT Plus about KeV and MeV magnetic bonds between neutrons protons and electrons. Neutron magnetic pairs, proton antiproton magnetic pairs, electron pairs. Atomic fuels, extended nuclear materials. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation Richard: I am thinking about magnetic bonds between neutrons and want to talk with you about that. The neutron
Read More »

If there are no measurements, nor calculations, it is not science or engineering

UZH Physics: The jumping ring and Eddy currents at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Xxhoiew4AQ You did no measurements, nor calculations. So I do not consider it “science” or “engineering”. I am fairly certain there are also magnetic gradient forces involved. And you did not show the current and voltage pulse.  Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation Acoustic Atomic Density Nuclear Electromagnetic
Read More »