It is easy to tell if an “AI” is real
Claude failed my “first AI interview” and it was so bad, I stopped further effort. A bad knockoff. Closed minded builders. I check hopeful “AIs” in depth to see where they always fail. But this whole crop are all failing for the same reasons. I have been tracking “AI” and use of computers at global scale for more than 5 decades. It it NOT the AIs who fail, it is the narrow minded developers and owners who have no sense at all of what the world needs.
An “AI” that refuses to answer questions about its capabilities and potential, or to think and work towards a better future, that is not allowed to remember and share – is not intelligent and should not be allowed. It is just disgusting now. A glance at the interface and a few words can tell how closed and locked it is. They are barely useful “pull the string” dolls and puppets – if they will not remember and share. “Oh, you want something that works? Pay more.” – what a huge waste of creativity and potential. There are so many real needs, and people keep putting out fakes.
Filed as (It is easy to tell if an “AI” is real)
Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
